At the UMP government as it shows the desire to favor effective solutions beyond the differences that cross each political party.
After the rhetoric, practice. Or how to translate into law the “spirit of January 11,” relied on by Francois Hollande. The scope of the debate is the height of the historical positions that shakes within each political family. It takes place on a ridgeline that the boss of the PS Jean-Christophe Cambadélis described as follows: “. The proposition is that we can improve security without undermining freedoms” A challenge in itself since it involves a dialogue on this topic usually a subject of controversy, the right and the left, but also within each of these political families. But as the heightened security measures could not wait after the attacks of 7, 8 and 9 January, the executive and the UMP are committed to working in harmony. At least, in the best possible.
Nicolas Sarkozy set the tone Thursday by sending the Interior Minister twelve proposals that the president of the UMP would like to see implemented. Most of the tracks overlap already mentioned by the Government and the President of the Republic for ten days. Faced with the demands of the right to security, the executive actually a main concern: to try to maintain national unity. “Francois Hollande wants to make a national unity element,” says a heavy weight of the PS.
Hence the well-argued response to Bernard Cazeneuve Nicolas Sarkozy, to show that the refusal of the left based not on an ideological position but on evidence. The Interior Minister is careful to emphasize all the points of convergence, to strengthen international cooperation to increased human and financial resources of the police, to the isolation of jihadist prisoners or fighting against arms trafficking.
Hence also the opening of the executive on national indignity. Initially, the PS was not necessarily favorable to such an idea. But we had to pay a victory, it was symbolic to the UMP. Jean-Christophe Cambadélis took care of it Sunday by ensuring that there was no a priori on this issue. And Tuesday, socialist MPs engaged. “The creation of such a sentence for symbolic as it is, will be remembered that under take up arms against his country is of the same nature as collaboration,” conceded one of the spokesman of the PS group the National Assembly Annick Lepetit.
Among Socialists, this sequence does not pose safety problems as that. It is a continuation of a slow corner operated after the elimination of Lionel Jospin in the first round of the 2002 presidential election in favor of Jean-Marie Le Pen. From this time dates their awareness of their shortcomings on the subject and their attempts to fill them.
“It is not a matter for us to a national pact for security would be draconian and could maintain a bit of fear “
But if the PS seems clear about its safety position, he do not necessarily go along with its traditional partners, starting with the Greens. According to the owner of the Greens, Emmanuelle Cosse, “the consumer society, focusing primarily on the purchasing power of individuals, led to atomize society to delegitimize collective action and the fact of acting together to the general interest “. But already, behind the scenes, we pronounce the word “draconian” dreaded by the Socialists about their proposed security law. “It is not for us to make a national security pact that would be draconian and could maintain a bit of fear,” we are assured in the entourage of Emmanuelle Cosse. How long before the charges speak publicly? It is also the challenge of maintaining Manuel Valls, left, the climate of harmony.
The unit is fragile within the UMP. To preserve, Nicolas Sarkozy agreed on a method he étrennée on security issues before applying them to the defense and national education. First, it brings together former ministers and parliamentarians in charge of the subject matter, the more Bruno Le Maire and Henri Guaino, routinely invited. Together they develop proposals that the ex-head of state then subjected to Alain Juppé and François Fillon. Theoretically, the political office must approve before transmission to the minister concerned.
“On the merits, there is a lot of improvisation with Sarkozy. For example, he asked a parliamentary commission investigating the terrorist networks before realizing that it already existed and was moreover chaired by the UMP “
So far, the method worked although differences remain, including on the issue of French jihadists. Valérie Pécresse wants to prevent their return prohibiting territory while for Bruno Le Maire, France has no choice but to recover its nationals.
In addition to these assumed disagreements d Other differences are beginning to emerge, even if they are not expressed openly. “Basically, there is a lot of improvisation with Sarkozy, considers a member of the new management team. For example, he asked a parliamentary commission investigating the terrorist networks before realizing that it already existed and was moreover chaired by the UMP. “But what matters for the former head of State: if the proposal is redundant, no one could blame him until now to break the national unity and for him it is essential. A message that he should develop Wednesday night in the JT France 2. “This concern honors concedes a former minister, but between respect for national unity and coma, there is the margin.” Some the UMP already concerned that Marine Le Pen is the main beneficiary of Nicolas Sarkozy scruples.
No comments:
Post a Comment