The court is easy. At the end, it’s always Christiane Taubira the culprit. We had already seen in the section Désintox how some were able to link the terrorist attacks from January to penal reform Christiane Taubira … The humorist Jean Roucas frontist and current values are being especially allied to a large number of hoax. Riding the death of Chloe, in Calais, Laurent Wauquiez has in turn played the game, lining up at the author of the show Corny. In a statement to AFP, the head UMP has targeted the Minister of Justice, calling its policy “madness” , and confusion and mixing pure bullshit:
“ First of all, we must shed light on this matter. There are too many unanswered questions. Will he had a major failure in the execution of the sentence? Why would someone who was to be deported and expelled has not been? We ask that the General Inspectorate of Judicial Services is entered. You should know and understand “ added:. ” This obviously raises the whole question of remission policy and automatic reductions Mrs (Christiane) Taubira “ Minister of Justice. ” In its circular, the Minister of Justice urged to strengthen these breaks. This predator he benefited? Obviously, the government policy is counter to our needs. Mrs Taubira makes criminal disarmament, the French expect the criminal rearmament. “
Desintox . There would thus had a major failure in the execution of the sentence, explaining the presence of the alleged murderer in the territory? If there was an error, it is not related to the execution of the sentence, but sentencing itself. March 30, 2010, Zbigniew H., alleged murderer of Chloe, was sentenced to six years in prison, with an additional penalty ban the territory. Which ban proved unenforceable, as explained by the prosecutor of Boulogne-sur-Mer Jean-Pierre Valensi. “The court imposed a permanent ban on French territory, which could not be brought into effect since its delivery was not legally incurred for the acts for which he was convicted.” In the case of extortion, an exclusion order may be imposed only if the extortion worsened. However, Zbigniew H., according to the Ministry of Justice, was convicted of extortion single
Wauquiez is also next to the plate when he asks accusingly. “Why would anyone which was to be deported and expelled did not? “ In fact, the quack on the Prohibition of the territory did not prevent Zbigniew H. leaving France, in the case of an international arrest warrant issued by Warsaw. On 30 September 2010 the Court of Appeal of Douai ordered the individual to be handed over to the Polish authorities upon his release. This was done on March 27, 2014. According to the court, the alleged murder returned to France on April 15th. Hard to see how Christiane Taubira, or policy, is responsible for this scenario …
The reductions penalty Taubira involved?
The second part of the statement Wauquiez is even more coarse. The manager says the UMP drama asks “the remission policy and automatic reductions Mrs Taubira” . He adds: “With its circular, the Minister of Justice urged to strengthen these breaks. This predator he benefited? Obviously, the government policy is counter to our needs. Mrs Taubira makes criminal disarmament, the French expect the criminal rearmament. “
Wauquiez would be wise to remember that what he called the ” remission policy and automatic reduction “ do not date Taubira but a 2004 law, passed under the right, then. The law of 9 March 2004 reformed the system of remission, replacing the sentence reductions granted based on evidence of good conduct condemned by a sentence reduction credit (CRP), based on a presumption of good conduct . This sentence reduction credits (three months for the first year, two months to the following) are now granted at the time of going to nut when the sentence is enforceable. The March 2004 law originally provided that repeat offenders can enjoy the same CRP. A year later, the law of September 2005 came on recidivism reduce these sentence reductions for convicted recidivism situation, the latter can no longer benefit only two months of CRP for the first year and 1 month for years. This is exactly what has benefited Zbigniew H, who was sentenced in legal recidivist. Imprisoned on 29 June 2009 to 21 March 2014, he received, according to our information, seven months of remission of credit.
To this were added eight months of additional sentence reductions (distributed as follows : 45 days in its first year of ownership, then 2 months and 50 days, then 2 months and 36 days). Again, Wauquiez would be unwise to cry foul or lax Taubira, these reductions are consistent with the legal framework set up by the right. The law in March 2004 establishment offers indeed that repeat offenders may, in addition to CRP, receive a maximum of two months of additional reductions per year, non-repeat offenders, which may take up to three months a year in prison. These additional remissions are linked to the good behavior of inmates at the prison.
It is true that penal reform Christiane Taubira now alter this framework by aligning the repeat offenders reduction regime with that from other convicts, both in terms of sentence reduction credit or additional sentence reductions. But contrary to what is suggested by Laurent Wauquiez, these developments could have no effect on the release of Zbigniew H. And because the law was enacted in August 2014, five months after the release of the alleged murderer of Chloe, intervened in March 2014.
Hence it follows, if we were to apply the demagogy Wauquiez, the sentence reductions Zbigniew H. is entirely due to the scandalous laxity of criminal policy development implemented by the right in 2004 …
No comments:
Post a Comment