INTOX. categorically Opposing the will of the French Council of the Muslim Faith (CFCM) to double the number of mosques in France within two years, Florian Philippot had pulled a funny fallacy: “all mosques are places of radicalization but 100% of radicalization places are mosques.” Relaunched by the host, Marine Le Pen adviser persists and signs: behind “sectors” jihadists, “there is often a mosque, radical sermons” . A demonstration to listen from 1’50.
Desintox The number “100%” is rarely synonymous with nuance and often heralding canard. And if one understands the stat of Philippot literally all hexagonal jihadists have been radicalized at one time or another by attending one of the 2200 mosques in France.
Like any process psychological, radicalization of a person remains an equation with many unknowns, and it is obvious that indoctrination through the Internet and attending a mosque are not mutually exclusive factors. Once this evidence recalled, several studies suggest that Philippot was guilty of a huge shortcut that is not based on absolutely nothing.
At least, the assertion of Philippot seriously with discordant analyzes ruling on the issue, which tend to show the Internet as the first finger radicalization vector. In February, Bernard Cazeneuve had repeated loop that “90% of those who rock in terrorism toggle through the Internet” to justify a decree to block sites that glorify terrorism. A figure from a report Prevention Centre against sectarianism related to Islam, based on a sample of 160 families “not necessarily representative of all families with children are affected” , the study itself, as release recalled at the time.
“80% of Syria returns have not attended the mosque or prison “
In December 2014, Pierre Conesa, professor at Sciences-Po and former senior official at the Defense Ministry, outlined the main lines of a ” against radicalization policy “ in a report commissioned by the Foundation for victims of terrorism. He cites sources of anti-terrorism court services ensuring that “80% of Syria returns have not attended the mosque or the prison” . In the same study, it notes that the “Mosques are less and less a place of radicalization,” as “known for their leadership Salafist ensure public speaking.” He also noted that mosques governed by formal structures, like the CFCM, are precisely targeted to the Salafists, who see them as “police collaborators” and “traitors to Islam” by their role as “early warning system” .
As noted by the Huffington Post , other specialists emphasized the decreasing role of mosques in the jihadist indoctrination. In an interview with World in 2013, Mohamed Ali Adraoui, researcher at the Institute of Political Studies in Paris, estimated that “thanks to the monitoring system set up in places of worship, it has become almost impossible to be radicalized in a mosque. [...] Today, those who intend to take action intersect mosques. “
A view shared by sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar, director of studies at EHESS and author in 2013 of a report on radicalization in prison. Asked by Le Point in the path of Kouachi brothers and Amedy Coulibaly, he felt that mosques are “more radical Islamic place of socialization, especially as they are now more or less under surveillance, “ rather radicalization through ” prison but also outside, like the Internet, or through friends. “
Finally, a high-profile example contradicts About Philippot. In November 2014, the course Hauchard Maxime, a young 22 year old Norman identified in a video collective beheadings of the Islamic state, was traced in detail, including release . Inhabitant of a rural town of 3,000 inhabitants with no mosque, the jihadist explained have radicalized itself with videos on the Internet. According to Le Monde if Hauchard was “from time to time in the mosque Elbeuf” , a place of worship that is not considered radical, he organized only his trip to Syria.
No comments:
Post a Comment