The National Assembly will vote on the text, by public ballot , at 16:15.
Sign of the controversy, the Constitutional Council should be entered twice, by deputies led by two elected UMP and Francois Hollande, is unprecedented under the Fifth Republic as regards a “Common law”. The Sages will examine the text after the parliamentary shuttle, the text to pass the Senate late May.
The government insists on the need to provide a legal framework for intelligence services, the last act tapping up to 1991, “when there were no mobile phone or internet.” “Tomorrow vote on #PJLRenseignement: the legitimized public services and controlled, the better protected French, our freedoms,” tweeted on Monday Prime Minister
Opponents text. denounce them, the establishment of a “general supervision” over the Internet, similar to the NSA in the United States practices denounced by the whistleblower Edward Snowden.
transpartisans divisions. The adoption of the text seems acquired since many members UMP said they would vote on, thus aligning the position of Nicolas Sarkozy. But the debate, which ended two weeks ago in the Assembly, have proved less consensual than expected, with strong dissenting voices on the right. Among them, those of the Raudière Laure and Pierre Lellouche, who met to date more than 70 MPs to seize the Constitutional Council, mainly on the benches of the UMP. Thierry Solère also announced Monday that it seized, with MEP Philippe Juvin, President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker of the bill “violates” according to them the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
UDI , former Defence Minister Herve Morin deplored “the creation of large” driftnet “gathering of infinite information.” He said he would not vote this text, without saying if he would vote against or abstain. The National Front has also spoke against a “generalized flicage”. On the left, most of the members Left Front and environmentalists should vote against or abstain. The group PS , which supports the government, as some elected Jean-Patrick Gille and Pouria Amirshahi nevertheless vote against, since “privacy – and therefore freedoms – are reached,” according to last.
Several controversial issues. The bill defines the missions of the intelligence services (prevention of terrorism to economic espionage) and the Conditions of authorization and control espionage techniques (tapping, installation of cameras or spy software, access to connection data, etc.). Black boxes particularly crystallize the debate: it is set up, on the networks of operators, automatic analysis tools (the famous algorithms) to detect a “suspicious succession of connection data” a “threat terrorist. “
The executive puts forward the contrary strengthening control services with the creation of a” national intelligence techniques Control Commission. ” Composed mainly of parliamentarians and judges, it must give notice to each implementation of these techniques, except in cases of emergency, and may refer to the Council of State in case of abuse. Opponents of the text lament the purely advisory nature of these notices and regrets that the Commission does not further supervised practical services. They are also concerned about the concentration of power in the hands of the government at the expense of court judges.
VIDEO. Intelligence Act: opponents phone the 577 deputies
type=”_moz”/>
& gt; Come discuss and ask questions on our forums!
No comments:
Post a Comment