The family helpers who recovered kids in 2000 Delay are unanimous. At the bar or by videoconference, they depict Chérif, Dimitri, Jonathan and Dylan crumbs. At the time, the placement of the four brothers is justified by the violence of their alcoholic father. In 2005, Thierry Delay finally condemned with their mother and a couple of neighbors to 20 years in prison for rape of minors in the Outreau case.
It is they, the “aunties”, which the first, sounded the alarm. These women had agreed Thursday to understand how were formed where the name lists were fired those 17 indicted for child rape, including that of Daniel Legrand. Man is judged in Rennes since Tuesday for rape and sexual assault on four brothers Delay. The accused remained impassive in the dock.
“A pencil in the buttocks”
When they arrived in their host families, children Delay, broken, have in common a report to atypical body. “It was dirty,” recalls Christiane Bernard. At 8, Dimitri “is still on it,” is “daubed with excrement.” The boy “rubs the back excessively.” Fears, too, to “be alone” with her husband. “It was just me who could enter his room,” said the assistant. At school, “he introduced a pencil in the buttocks.” At home, he was surprised that an 8 year old girl will do “not have sex with his friends.” The homes of Darques Françoise early evidence that “it is very difficult as a woman to help Cherif to dress. He refused physical contact.” At the famile CHOCHOIS, Jonathan will not eat with a fork, used for home penetrations.
In 2000, Dimitri Cherif, Jonathan and Dylan might be placed, they continue to visit their relatives on the weekends. “I was driving Chérif was recovering Saturday and Sunday,” recounts Françoise Darques. Sometimes Myriam Badaoui going turn. “I was waiting for the call from the mother because when it was wrong, she did not take it.”
This is the word of Dimitri which is released first. “He started to say he did not go with mom and dad.” Then he refers to “porn videotapes” and “a man who puts his ass in front of another,” his “dad who puts his front in his mouth while her mother holds.” Stories, esteem his family assistant, who can not be invented. “It was the things he had experienced.” She asks if the abuses are confined to the domestic sphere. No, the child “starts counting on his fingers the number of people” involved.
“Never heard of Daniel Legrand”
The Assize Court is planning the first list of names drawn up by Dimitri as a result of his revelations. Today and major civil party, the young man does not squill. The atmosphere in the courtroom becomes heavier. It is a loose sheet torn from a spiral notebook. A kid is lying on writing paper. In the upper left corner succeed names, nicknames and ages. No trace of Daniel Legrand. The tata Sharif reiterates that it has “never heard”.
Christiane is cautious. To see if the child is lying, she hands her traps. Two desserts if exchange release. The description of the facts remain the same. It then signals the overwhelming confidence to its referent which in turn alert the police.
Passing the family home, Dimitri he revealed to his brothers his confession and content? The other siblings, anyway, speak in turn. “One day, recalls Jonathan, I was watching a football match with Mr. CHOCHOIS. I asked him to make me certain things and he refused. I said ‘you do not you do that? Mom and Dad, they , they do that. ‘” When he is bored, he claims a film X. Sharif remains traumatized by a pornographic tape received Christmas gift wish and watched family. Since then, Françoise offers only present without packaging.
Two new lists of names
Six months after the commencement of the trial in June 2001, two additional lists are sent to investigators. The first is written in the hand of the child and mentions vague knowledge. The second is a “retranscription” by the family of Dimitri assistant statements. For the first time in the procedure, “Dany Legrand in Belgium” appears. “If it says is that this is what he told me,” insists Christiane.
The defense is trying to demonstrate that it could confuse a qualification (the big one) with a name (Legrand). These uncertainties cast a cold. The atmosphere becomes polar When it’s round Sylvie CHOCHOIS. The “tata” Jonathan stands before the court about unpublished. Jonathan, on hearing the name “Legrand”, asked him “What is his name or is it because he’s great?” If the worker has forgotten the context and can not say more, fuse interpretations. Did he want a clarification on someone he knew? Was he trying to obtain information it did not own? The day before, the young man claimed that Daniel Legrand “was there” at his home during sexual abuse.
Another issue raised at the hearing: Have the workers been able to compare the versions of their children? And thus suggest names for verification? “I became a little girl with Mrs. CHOCHOIS, recognizes Christiane, and when we saw, it is true, we came to talk about the children.” And discuss the revelations? “Yes, it could happen.” All these elements under chilling consequences that these lists have had to read the instruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment