To ease tensions, Valls met Wednesday afternoon PS deputies. Result: the president of the Socialist group in the Assembly Bruno Le Roux announced to 17 hours that there was “more misunderstanding with the government” on the formulation of the application for revocation of citizenship and considered that a “vast majority” of members would vote PS constitutional revision.
The government, he said, raised “the misunderstanding on the prohibition of statelessness,” which was present in the draft implementing legislation and that caused a strong reaction PS deputies on Tuesday. According to them, this meant that the forfeiture could only apply to de facto binational.
“More or reference to dual nationality or statelessness”
“We agree with the government that the bill (of implementation of the constitutional revision) does not refer either to dual nationality or statelessness,” said the leader of Socialist deputies and close to Francois Hollande.
Also present in the hall of the Four Columns, the speaker of the PS group on constitutional revision, patrick mennucci, said he was “completely reassured” by the Prime Minister, who would have made this clarification at a lunch with several parliamentarians. “The main thing for us is that there is no discrimination binational” hammered this elected Bouches-du-Rhône. “I prefer a stateless person every 15 years rather than five million binational stigmatized,” he began.
What was said Manuel Valls in this lunch is to accept the possibility of ” forfeiture for all, “said MP hostile to the principle of forfeiture of nationality. The Prime Minister later confirmed to some of Socialist deputies, meeting after the questions to the government in a hall of the Palais Bourbon, “there would be no mention of statelessness” in the text of application, according to several participants.
“The application text (the deprivation of nationality component) will return to compliance with our international commitments, which will result in ratification (of the 1961 convention on statelessness ed.) And as part of the ratification, we will decide on the issue of statelessness, “said for his part Christophe Caresche a few journalists.
This is the judge will pronounce the penalty of forfeiture
At the press conference on Wednesday, Stéphane Le Foll reminded that “the objective of the speech of Versailles was the face of terrorism, national unity.” “Now is the responsibility of Parliament” has dealt Stéphane Le Foll. He explained again that would be the “ordinary courts” to impose the penalty of forfeiture. “A sentence for a conviction”, has he still insisted.
“We respect the commitments of the President in his speech at Versailles and the will to gather around concrete proposals (…) From there, each now must assume its responsibility, the framework is set, “he repeated.
But the Minister of Agriculture was very annoyed when reporters asked if the text was now written so that binational are not the only ones affected by the measure .
“I do not have to specify these things because it is the Prime Minister who will present permanently at the beginning of the debate” the text, has he responded before attempting to move on. The exchanges continued, still very tense between Stéphane Le Foll and these without more precision.
In addition, he explained that “the state of emergency would be extended until the new law on criminal procedures be implemented.” The proposed extension is for the time of three months.
“The terrorist threat is still at an extremely high level, justified Stéphane Le Foll, France and at European level.” “The state of emergency is very useful in the fight against terrorism,” has he yet secured explaining that he had enabled the seizure of 42 weapons of war and 407 house arrest.
The debate in the Assembly on the text begins Friday at the Assembly. On the left, the oppositions are always tough. And right, they grow. Wednesday morning, Senate President Gerard Larcher even proposed to Francois Hollande “stop here.”
No comments:
Post a Comment