The calculation made by Nicolas Sarkozy by not giving instructions to vote on the law Khomri El – Atlantico.fr

Atlantico: Unlike the deprivation of nationality, for which he had clearly asked to vote, Nicolas Sarkozy gave no instructions to vote on El Khomri law (one of his relatives Luc Chatel supports the same). Why do you

Michel Urvoy : Precisely because he was trapped by the lapse project whose formulation has changed! So it does not, and this is logical, promise to vote for a project he ignores the final version. So he wants to avoid getting again in cantilever. There’s a difference between supporting the text as it stands today and vote on the draft as amended it will in fine written

.

Incidentally, not giving set, it prevents it from being disowned by Members of his family. But I think the right is fairly united on this position, both favorable and prudent, no knowing what will happen to the project in the coming weeks. While on a particular technical aspect, there may be discussion.

Nicolas Sarkozy said that the students and the students were manipulated by “conservatives”. Which he refers? Why he calls this way, raising Valls and Hollande to the rank of courageous reformers?

The first concern of Nicolas Sarkozy is not bragging reformist will of François Hollande and Manuel Valls ! it is to show that they were elected on a “lie” – he regularly uses the term – which explains the sense of betrayal slingers and disappointed voters. The “conservative” in his mind, are obviously those left – student unions movement Young Socialists (MJS), far left, Left Front, slingers – who often voted Hollande in the second round, and preventing more fluid the world of work and trying to “gauchiser” Government policy. He is betting that the President and the Prime Minister will fail, and they will appear as powerless to reform the country. And he draws the conclusion that the executive is prisoner forces who believed he would lead a more political left as his true nature is social democratic or liberal. Everyone will have noted that the reform of labor law do not really like the tone of Le Bourget speech!

So far he wished to embody a radical opposition left even moderate, is it changing course? How he seeks to position itself in relation to its competitors right? Attempts he cut the grass under the feet of Alain Juppe who has refused to make systematic opposition, sometimes even blurring the dividing lines?

I think things are simple

. <- partner tags: VideoAd (top) ->

First, Nicolas Sarkozy leaves the left to break the figure alone. There will be time to argue that it is disqualified for reforming the country. He is not opposed to reform, but the method that led to the stalemate.

Second, it can not support a project he does not know what will. But he can oppose a project that, as it stands, is part of that requires all right.

Third, this is not so there -Dessus that Nicolas Sarkozy, if present in the primary, will campaign, but on issues that cleave more in the internal electorate to the party vis-à-vis Alain Juppe or NKM: immigration , security, identity, mobilizing more when it comes to mobilizing the heart of Sarkozy’s electorate. The issue of labor law is more a theme than the presidential primary. For me, there is no shift or material on this subject, to cut the grass under the feet of the primary competitors

<- partner tags.! VideoAd (bot ) -> <- partner tags: mediabong ->