Several Members were in fact relayed criticism of the bill expressed outside the Chamber and qualified in “fantasies” by Manuel Valls.
The digital has changed gives
Prime Minister came in the afternoon to defend himself strengthening the powers of the intelligence services at the time of “digital society that has changed the game” of the fight against terrorism.
“When trade is hidden, there must be around the obstacle, or by the use of certain computer intrusion techniques or by the use of sound private places or by real-time geolocation of people “ is he justified.
text ” installs in any way a police surveillance camera of the population “, he assured denouncing ” fantasies “ of those who in recent days in the press denounced the beginning of a “mass surveillance” .
Fear of draconian laws
The adoption of the text, which will be debated and voted on until Thursday May 5 certainly does no doubt. “The war against terrorism requires to overcome political differences … This is the reason why we take our responsibility by supporting, very controlling way, Bill” , has announced UMP Eric Ciotti on behalf of his group in response to the Prime Minister.
But in the evening several elected UMP as Patrick Hetzel, Patrick Devedjian, Claude Goasguen, Lionel Tardy or Pierre Lellouche held a pretty speech different, not hesitating to suggest a potentially text “draconian” if “misused” . FN Marion Maréchal-Le Pen can it “explain to the French that their safety will be at the price of their freedom” .
The bill, which is part of the legislative response to the attacks of Paris but was decided in July 2014, wants to give a legal framework for intelligence services in France so far operated in a “gray area” in the rapporteur Jean-Jacques Urvoas (PS).
It defines the service tasks (indoor, outdoor, military, customs …) that go beyond “prevention of terrorism” . Several members of the left wing of the PS as Pascal Cherki or environmentalists as Sergio Coronado and were worried about the “fuzzy” a mission like “the defense and promotion of economic, major industrial and scientific of France “ while for Mr. Urvoas the contrary ” our services must fight against the economic predation “. Other purpose long disputed, “prevention of injury to the republican form of institutions, collective violence likely to undermine national security” .
The heart of the control debates
For the former Defence Minister Herve Morin IDUs, “The scope is far too broad, it covers the entire life of the national community” . “It is not the new provisions” , said the interior minister Bernard Cazeneuve.
Members continue Tuesday afternoon debate on the tasks before moving intelligence techniques (tapping, laying cameras or spy software, access to connection data, etc.) to monitor the person (or his friends) and their authorization scheme (purpose, duration, retention and destruction . data …) under the control of a new independent administrative authority
A point focus the fears of NGOs and the digital actors: the establishment, on the networks of operators of automatic analysis tools (an algorithm) to detect a “suspicious succession login data” “terrorist threat” . Several computer data hosting threatened to move their servers to protest against what amounts to “mass surveillance form” .
“The monitoring will be focused strictly on the threatening behavior “, said Mr. Valls announcing amendments to control these algorithms and more generally to protect intelligence technical professions (judges, parliamentarians, journalists, lawyers).
Mr. Urvoas insists his side on “guarantees” made by the future National Commission for Monitoring of Intelligence techniques (CNCTR) to be “much more powers” that CNCIS (National Control Commission Security interceptions) it replaces
This Commission. – composed of four judges, four MPs and a specialist in electronic communications – must give prior notice to each implementation these techniques in the country, except in emergencies. The Prime Minister will override but its reasons. The Commission may access the information collected, their traceability and premises where they are centralized. It may also refer to the Council of State.
No comments:
Post a Comment