Christiane Taubira ‘wishes failure “of the constitutional review, but savings Holland – The World

After his resignation on January 27 appeared in an issue of Michel Denisot, the release of his book, his interview with Le Monde … Christiane Saturday, February 6 Taubira was invited to the show “We are not lying” on France 2. once again, the former Minister of Justice justified its decision to leave the government, because of its “major disagreement” with François Hollande on deprivation of nationality

Read also:. “We’re not lying ‘, highlight the media plan Taubira

Christiane Taubira explained that it is not a party in December for not itself open to criticism from the right: “We do not share in the din. On such an important issue, I did not allow any ambiguity, any misunderstanding. “ The resigning minister reiterated his opposition bluntly constitutional reform debated by parliamentarians:

” If it does not pass, I say fine. Honestly, I wish the failure of that provision. (…) I hope that the left did not have to take part in the constitution such a mark. “

” I’m not going to commit myself to Montebourg “

However, M ^me Taubira was careful not to overwhelm Francois Hollande, who reaffirmed his admiration for “behavior, the attitude, the words” of the head of state face facing unprecedented terrorist attacks in France.

“I do not pass judgment on the president. If we went through the disaster of January 2015 and this kind of indefinable cataclysm November 2015, it is because we have a president who has responded. Several times I got chills imagining it to be a different president in that time. “

As already looming election due in 2017, the former candidate for presidency in 2002, now free of the government, has not revealed his intentions. Asked about possible support for Arnaud Montebourg, who has long argued for a VI ^th Republic, M ^me Taubira has kicked into touch:

“I made the primary campaign with him, but that’s not the issue. I’m not going to commit myself to Arnaud Montebourg, make that clear. (…) The left, is movement, dynamics, collective deliberation. This fixation on the person, not the history of the left. “