D ifficile to see clearly. The head of government Manuel Valls and Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve respectively were guests of the newspaper France 2 and TF1 on Friday night. And the least we can say is that what they were at least confused, especially on the profile of the suspect, or rather the jihadist track.
When the Prime Minister made the connection between Thursday is the event that occurred and radical Islam, Bernard Cazeneuve refuses however to confirm the information, preferring to await the outcome of the investigation. A new government that does not quack calls for transparency.
“France is at war”
The bomber Nice to Thursday night’s truck is a “terrorist undoubtedly linked to radical Islamism,” even if the investigation is to confirm, said Prime Minister Manuel Valls. “It’s probably a terrorist linked to radical Islam in one way or another,” he insisted. His comments therefore commit the head of government but not the interior minister. For now, nothing seems to indeed allow corroborate Islamist motivations of the suspect shot dead Thursday night. But the prime minister has perhaps information allowing it to be so positive.
Manuel Valls also said that France was “at war” and for him, terrorist character of the attack is clear. “Yes, it is a terrorist act. We met the wounded families with a heavy heart. We can not get used to that. We have always told the truth. It wages war. First in Iraq and Syria. And this organization Daech back. And then there are these terrorists, the radical Islam within our borders. I want to tell our countrymen that we will win this war, but there will probably still innocent victims. This is a long war. “
If this is a terrorist act, as the government says, where are the accomplices? “Has for its part insurgent Christian Estrosi, President of the Nice Côte d’Azur metropolis, which denounced bluntly” laxity “of the government.
leparisien.fr
On the same subject
& gt. Nice: the author of the attack is unknown Tunisian information
& gt; LIVE. Nice attack: according Valls, no fault of the security forces
No comments:
Post a Comment