While the government has only to go on vacation, the Constitutional Council’s decision to censor Article first pact responsibility cast a chill in the socialist ranks. The executive immediately promised to compensate the decision by new tax measures in the next Finance Bill. But the censorship of this provision, which benefited the smaller by introducing a graduated reduction in contributions of employees earning between a 1.3 minimum wage, many parliamentarians concerned.
class=”lire”> Read also our article: Covenant of Responsibility: Constitutional Council censorship relief of employee contributionsGérard Bapt, MP for Haute-Garonne and rapporteur of the draft Financing Act Social Security (PLFSS) regrets this decision and reflects the following:
“This decision is very annoying and very damaging because it involves an important element that kept pouring in solidarity that economic impact: € 2 billion for the year for modest wages, it is so much immediate consumption. (…) I will quickly return me to the CBC group (socialist, republican and citizen) and to the government so that we can find a solution for the measurement to be kept at 1 st January 2015 . “
LEFT OF REACTIVE PS THE IDEA OF CSG
But the left of the PS group took the opportunity to criticize again pact of responsibility. Thus, the member of the Nièvre, Christian Paul, a slingers who opposed Manuel Valls, demand a rethinking:
“This decision strongly imbalance responsibility pact, which was already highly questionable in its distribution between firms and households. This makes it even more necessary overhaul of all the choices that were made, and at the beginning of September. “
Read our story (subscribers edition): The” rebellious “undermine the majority
MP the opportunity to revive the idea of a progressive CSG, a choice that “had the merit of being less questionable legally, to obtain the same result in terms of purchasing power and engage in tax reform magnitude “. “We will re-propose this possibility was in the program of the Socialist Party and was a commitment François Hollande” says Mr. Paul.
shared by Senator of Paris Marie-Noëlle Lienemann idea: <- atom snippet ->
Alas we must repeat, stop the crafts, giveaways, relief contributions. Faster overall reform of taxation and levies
-. Lienemann MN (@ mnlienemann) August 6, 2014
Same reasoning for Jean-Marc Germain, former chief of staff and Martine Aubry member of the Hauts-de-Seine:
“It was a risk that we highlighted. The Constitutional Council had already issued a notice the same when we tried under Lionel Jospin, to reduce premiums for smaller, with a franchise. What I hope is that the government will use this disavowal to a real policy of purchasing power and to use the right tool. Given this decision it remains one: the gradual CSG. “
M. Bapt judge this idea of CSG “technically very difficult” to implement.
Others question the decision of the sages. Yann Galut, MP Dear evokes a decision “biased” while Denis Baupin, Green MP in Paris, is campaigning for a change of Constitution <- atom snippet ->
Since censorship devices fight against tax optimization I think the Council is biased Constit … new decision …
– Yann Galut ن (@ yanngalut) August 6, 2014
The Constitution of the Vth would therefore reduce employer contributions and employee contributions not?? Strongly the VIth
– Denis_Baupin (@ Denis_Baupin) August 6, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment