His peers in politics, and most observers, readily say to characterize Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, she is a “troublemaker.” In the macho world of politics is defined in this way a woman since it expresses his thoughts clearly, she disdains not display his ambition and it is beautiful. This is the case of NKM, previously vice president of the UMP and maintained, despite the odds, the same position in the new party, the Republicans. Much has been said that Nicolas Sarkozy wanted to get rid of it when he built the organizational structure of his new party. But why the “preferred” she seemed to fall from grace with such suddenness? What (s) package (s) policy (s) she has been able to carry? It was very simple: to speak and act freely – what was agreed between her and Sarkozy – but stressed divergent analyzes on many important subjects. And that, the former president supports it increasingly ill at time of super rightward at the time of the return to ideology without Buisson Buisson ..
An inevitable solidarity
NKM had already noted above, approving gay marriage, but especially denying the democratic right, if it returns to power, would be able to defeat the Taubira law. At the time, this gap was arranging Nicolas Sarkozy because he showed the public that, on company business, the opposition was not as monolithic as the most reactionary theories could be disproved, that modernity n is not, by definition, detestable. NKM will nevertheless quickly caught in the middle: how to take the inevitable solidarity? How not to be destroyed by the ideological axis that is set up between Sarkozy and number 3 of the party, Laurent Wauquiez, one by right-wing demagogy to outbid the other, and vice versa? Assuming contradictions, standing out, not necessarily kowtowing the pretext of discipline.
The political rupture could have been consumed in the aftermath of the local elections and county: Sarkozy had favored the neither-nor, neither socialist nor FN, breaking in this way the most basic republican solidarity; NKM had announced loudly that she did not accept this equidistance, it seemed intellectually pernicious and detestable. Nicolas Sarkozy, while its union efforts, had said nothing. The note, he threatened to make him pay later. He eventually renounced.
It was all the more exasperated the Lady does not disassemble, ever. The convention provided on Islam? A bad idea, wrong even at the very moment the company is in tension with respect to its relations with Muslims. Sarkozy decides there to dry, “not serve the soup in Holland”, the recent ceremony of the Pantheon; NKM attends the name precisely of national unity and the Republican tolerance, stating hollow, without the need to stipulate it, recite it everywhere and in every tone, an open concept of the republic, a design that resonates oddly echoing the way Sarkozy republicanism. That is, this expression different and unique than the head of LR resents.
A party in his boot
The times are not only in the spirit of Nicolas Sarkozy, the incessant proclamation of “union.” The union slogan, union as a political way of life, the union itself, it’s over. The primary battle is engaged and to win it, the former President is satisfied that the party must now be in his boot, in its sole and exclusive service. In this new context, it will continue to play with NKM, and use his freedom to think. It is precisely on this point that Nicolas Sarkozy is evidence of skill: it seems to have understood that without the rightward turning back will not be enough during the primary and eventually the first round of presidential elections. Therefore, to counter Alain Juppe and Bruno Le Maire, he maintained NKM.
At least this confrontation is it not petty, purely tactical. It covers real political and cultural issues about the nature of the Republican right. We understand that sometimes annoys NKM, too arrogant, too convinced of his talent. Recognize that in this case it helps give meaning and content to the political reflection. A good point.
No comments:
Post a Comment