The solemn vote on the constitutional review will be held Wednesday in the Assembly. Tuesday night, Manuel Valls said he expected “with confidence”, while the Economy Minister, Emmanuel Macron, criticized the debate on the deprivation of nationality. “We must prevent and punish relentlessly in the national community,” he has dealt at a conference in Paris at the Foundation France-Israel. “We talk about terrorists and therefore an extreme situation (…) We must take the problem as such. No more no less. Not as a debate on dual nationality nor a debate on French nationality, “reports Le Figaro.
Before the vote, article 2 continued to divide each camp, despite the admonitions of Manuel Valls and Nicolas Sarkozy. On Tuesday, in the Chamber, the battering against the controversial measure came from the Socialist benches, environmentalists, but also the right and center.
29 deletion amendments were submitted by MPs PS, EELV, LR or UDI. They were rejected by 176 votes against, 118 for and 23 abstentions. That portends a favorable vote in the wording proposed by the government. But which leaves the suspense for the final vote of the Congress with regard to the majority of 3 / 5th of Parliament required to review the Constitution.
In a much lined chamber for the vote of the day on the state of emergency, fuse critics. Reform? “An indelible mark, which is not to the honor of our Republic, ‘says the boss of Deputies Left Front, André Chassaigne. “Carrier foul ideology”, criticizes the environmentalist Isabelle Attard. “Totally inappropriate,” balance the elected RS, Jean-François Lamour. “One masquerade” disapproves Lionel Tardy (LR). “The president of the republic would grow by taking the initiative to put an end to this debate,” said the MP MoDem Jean Lassalle.
“A discussion that starts in every sense”
The Socialists slingers headwind against reform, rise in recall. “Wisdom command that we did not go further,” defends Pouria Amirshahi. Christian Paul protested against “a debate that divides the country, which divides the right and left,” “a debate became an obstacle to national unity.” A Manuel Valls, who ask members to respect the “oath” of Versailles, Benoît Hamon retorted: “The speech of the President of the Republic has nothing to do with Article 2 of the text you offer.” Laurent Baumel will further. “The French know that sometimes Hollande speech is not inscribed in reality,” the rebellious load.
present in the Chamber to defend the text, the Prime Minister does not move not one iota. “Any amendment goes in that direction, delete, or rewrite, calls into question the commitment of the President taken before the French people in the Congress of Versailles,” he warns, recalling having ” proposed a new wording to reflect the elements of the debate. ” “The government has heard the arguments invoking a possible breach of equality,” he insists. On the occasion of a new speech, Valls insists: “The only difference I make in that case, the only egalitarian element is between the terrorists and the French. It is the fundamental difference. “
Pillars of the majority are involved in support. LR several MPs, including Eric Woerth and Claude Goasguen, too. As the boss of UDI deputies, Philippe Vigier, however, forced to admit that “different voice” expressed in his group. The president of the PS group, Bruno Le Roux, welcomed that “dialogue has resulted in a rewrite.” And called in a tasty slip, to “reject Article 2″ … and not the abolition of Article 2. Amendments Calling for “national decline” rather than nationality, the deputy PS Yann Galut hides not some dismay: “We are facing a debate that goes in all directions.”
No comments:
Post a Comment