President of IDU proposes to open a public debate to “look if it is not appropriate to add to the currency of the Republic a fourth pillar, secularism.”
In an attempt to voice the uniqueness of the centrist vote, Jean-Christophe Lagarde attacked vigorously Tuesday in what he called the ” Lépine contest of the lethal weapon antidjihadiste “ongoing, according to him, left and right. The president of the UDI cited jumble the “booklet for secularism” that Najat Vallaud-Belkacem wants to set up in all schools, the “Patriot Act” desired by Valérie Pécresse and “solitary confinement” the extent deemed necessary by the UMP already announced by Manuel Valls
This did not prevent him from out his own proposal. open a debate with “all of our citizens who marched in the street, like those who refused to do so “, to” look it is not appropriate to add to the currency of the Republic a fourth pillar of secularism. ” Lagarde wants to defend this idea with Francois Hollande.
For the rest, he wants “a comprehensive response” based on a “serious diagnosis, shared and uncompromising flaws evoked Manuel Valls and have allowed that in our nation (…) are born and grow people who acquire the hatred of the country they were born and educated them, or should have done. “
That’s theory. In practice, the tracks that the new boss has listed centrists do not differ from those on which the UMP work as the government. He called for the adoption of the NRP (transfer of airline passenger data), currently frozen in the European Parliament, better international coordination, increased resources allocated to the police and intelligence services, the strengthening of the response . criminal terrorism with reform of the prison organization, and better monitoring of the Internet
The centrist speech, however, has a characteristic firmness against the communalism. Tuesday in the Assembly, the Chairman of the IDU group, Philippe Vigier, was the first speakers to put the “radical Islam” charge. Jean-Christophe Lagarde, who shares this analysis cited among the issues to be addressed “the organization of the Muslim faith, which obviously needs to be revised.” He wants to end “the accommodations that local authorities have concluded on secularism”, from halal food in canteens to self-censorship on the Holocaust in some schools. More than security, it is on these issues that consensus may be difficult to find.
No comments:
Post a Comment