Labour law: El Khomri refuses “to the threat” of 49.3 – Cross

The Minister of Labour Myriam El Khomri said he was “impatient” to defend from Tuesday the Labour Law in the National Assembly, but “refuses to make the threat” of the use of Article 49-3 of the Constitution to impose the text.

in an interview published Tuesday in Le Parisien / Aujourd’hui en France, the Minister noted that “the Constitution provides that tool” in Article 49-3, but ” I refuse to make the threat. “

” I’m not in this perspective “to use the article says Ms. El Khomri, waiting to see” how things place “. Parliament

the question,” your resignation she will be on the table in case of 49-3, “Ms. El Khomri answers:” for me, the debate aims to enrich text, not distorting it. But I do not confuse the proposals to be studied and obstructions that aim to prevent and delay “.

Asked about the 40 missing votes to vote the text, Minister made the observation: “this is a pointer to a said date. The respect I have for the Assembly leads me to think that dialogue and the exchange can arise a majority evolution. My goal is to convince parliamentarians of the majority. This text is an act of trust in the social dialogue as close to the ground “

On the issue of dismissal Minister assures.” I do not close the door to developments “He continued. “to throw an incomprehension. Many said that this was to facilitate the dismissal, this is absolutely not the case. We will frame it. Today there is a misuse of conventional failures, especially in TPE. The law aims to correct this, because employees are better protected if they are laid off for economic reasons. “

About the violence that took place after the May 1 parade in Paris, and often after the Night rallies standing on the Republic square in the capital, Mrs. El Khomri emphasizes that “it is important not to confuse demonstrators and rioters. Protesters make use of a law, the rioters want to overthrow the institutions. They are in a destructive approach, which has nothing to do with the content of the bill. “

” The time came and Parliament will enrich the text. Should we give in to the street and remove the text? No, “yet says the Minister of Labour.

afp